AgentData vs Hunter: verified emails, plus the company behind them, free
Hunter for verifying and sending; AgentData for finding the companies worth emailing, and their stacks, free.
Hunter is the best-known email finder and its verifier is excellent. Its free plan gives you 50 credits a month; paid plans run $49 to $299 a month for 2,000 to 25,000 credits, and every email found costs one. AgentData returns the same company's verified emails and people together with its tech stack, sector, size and web signals, at 1,000 lookups a day for $0, with the REST API and MCP server included. Both offer an MCP server on every plan. Every figure on this page was read from hunter.io on 17 September 2026.
Hunter is the tool I used for years before we built our own crawler, and its verifier is still the one I'd trust to tell me whether an address will bounce. What changed for me was the shape of the question. I stopped asking “what's this person's email?” and started asking “which companies running Intercom in the UK have a head of support I can reach?” Hunter answers the first question very well and the second not at all. AgentData was built for the second. If you only ever need the first, Hunter's free plan is a fine place to stay.
The verdict
- build lists by what companies run, not just who works there
- want emails, people and tech stack in one free lookup instead of one credit per email
- are building an agent and want an MCP server and API without a monthly credit ceiling
- need company profile fields (sector, size, business model, web signals) with the contact
- want to see who just dropped a competitor's tool before you email them
- need a dedicated email verifier with a published deliverability track record
- run outreach from the same tool (Hunter Campaigns and sequences are built in)
- rely on Hunter's Chrome extension and Google Sheets add-on in a manual workflow
- want the source URL and date for every address Hunter found
One company, two responses
Hunter's Domain Search returns a list of emails for a domain with a confidence score and verification status; each result costs one credit. AgentData's lookup returns the emails and people alongside the company profile and its technologies for one lookup. Both structures are from the vendors' own documentation, read 17 September 2026.
{
"data": {
"domain": "intercom.com",
"organization": "Intercom",
"emails": [{
"value": "ciaran@intercom.com",
"type": "personal",
"confidence": 92,
"first_name": "Ciaran", "last_name": "Lee",
"position": "Support Engineer", "seniority": "senior", "department": "it",
"sources": [{ "domain": "github.com", "uri": "http://github.com/ciaranlee",
"extracted_on": "2015-07-29", "last_seen_on": "2017-07-01" }],
"verification": { "date": "2019-12-06", "status": "valid" }
}]
}
}1 credit per email returned. Rate limit 15 requests/second. Hunter's sources array (where the address was seen) is a strength we don't match.
{
"domain": "intercom.com",
"company": { "name": "Intercom", "sector": "Software & SaaS", "size": "large", "b2b_b2c": "b2b",
"email_pattern": "first", "mx_provider": "google-workspace",
"signals": { "has_pricing_page": true, "has_api_docs": true, "has_careers_page": true } },
"technologies": [{ "name": "Intercom", "category": "Live chat", "confidence": "high" },
{ "name": "Segment", "category": "Analytics", "confidence": "high" }],
"emails": { "total": 42, "verified": 38,
"data": [{ "email": "…@intercom.com", "title": "Support Engineer", "confidence": 95,
"verification_status": "valid", "verified_at": "2026-09-01T10:30:00Z" }] },
"people": { "total": 156, "data": [{ "name": "…", "title": "Head of Support", "seniority": "director" }] },
"lookup": { "consumed": true, "remaining": 999 }
}One lookup returns everything above. 1,000 lookups a day, free.
AgentData vs Hunter at a glance
Pricing and features verified 17 September 2026 against hunter.io/pricing, hunter.io/api-documentation/v2 and hunter.io/mcp; confirm current details on each vendor's site.
Why agent builders and growth teams pick AgentData over Hunter
Hunter tells you who's at a domain. AgentData tells you who's there, what they run, and whether they just changed something.
A domain with 40 people costs 40 credits on Hunter and one lookup here.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
"https://agentdata.run/api/v1/lookup?domain=intercom.com"API docs →Connect in one command and ask for companies by technology, then the people at them.
claude mcp add agentdata --transport http https://mcp.agentdata.run/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
# then: "Find UK fintechs running Intercom and Stripe; give me the head of support's verified email at each."lookup_companysearch_companiesfind_peopleget_technologiesget_signalscheck_usage“Companies using Klaviyo with 50–200 staff in Germany” is a filter here and a research project on Hunter.
Email the company the week it dropped a competitor, not the quarter after.
Pricing: AgentData vs Hunter
Hunter is flat-priced by credits and generous with seats. The comparison is what your monthly volume costs in credits versus $0.
You keep at least $408/yr with AgentData at this volume.
Hunter prices from hunter.io/pricing, 17 September 2026. 1 credit = 1 email found; verification 0.5 credit; annual billing is 30% less. AgentData: 1,000 lookups a day.
Pricing history 2021–2026
Hunter's entry price hasn't moved in four years. What changed is what a credit buys and what sits above Starter. Entry paid plan per month. Cells link to Arquivo.pt captures of hunter.io/pricing, which render in EUR; USD parity is our inference. CPI: BLS CUUR0000SA0.
What changed
- 2022: “Enterprise” 399 renamed Business; Enterprise becomes contact-sales.
- By April 2023: Growth 99 → 149 (+51%), Pro 199 removed, Business 399 → 499 (+25%); Growth quota raised; pay-as-you-go credit add-ons introduced.
- By August 2024: pricing page defaults to annual billing (Starter shown at 34).
- By March 2025: Business replaced by Scale at 209 annual (299 monthly); top published price cut about 40%; new Data Platform (API) tab.
- 2026: searches and verifications merged into one credit pool; Free plan 25 searches → 50 credits; verification now 0.5 credit.
AgentData vs Hunter, feature by feature
Verification: Hunter's strongest card
Hunter publishes a multi-method verification pipeline and a standalone verifier; ours is built into the lookup.
- AgentData: 8-layer SMTP pipeline (syntax, MX, disposable, role-based, RCPT TO, catch-all, TLS fallback, confidence score); result in verification_status and confidence.
- Hunter: Dedicated Email Verifier endpoint, 0.5 credit, 10 req/s, deliverability language on the pricing page.
Source: hunter.io/pricing, api-documentation/v2, agentdata.run/docs
Finding: domain → people
Same job, different unit economics.
- AgentData: find_people filters by title, seniority, department, has_email, email_confidence; one lookup per company.
- Hunter: Domain Search with department/seniority filters; one credit per email returned.
Source: As above
Technology and signals
The two things Hunter doesn't do.
- AgentData: 4,077 technologies per company; switch signals per company.
- Hunter: None.
Source: hunter.io product pages, 17 September 2026
Agent access
Both ship MCP free. Ours is technographic.
- AgentData: mcp.agentdata.run/mcp, npm, seven tools, no credits.
- Hunter: mcp.hunter.io/mcp, OAuth or X-API-Key, all plans, credits apply.
claude mcp add agentdata --transport http https://mcp.agentdata.run/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"Source: hunter.io/mcp; hunter.io/blog/hunter-mcp-server-bringing-ai-and-b2b-data-together
Who moves from Hunter to AgentData
Fifty credits a month runs out on day three. AgentData's 1,000 lookups a day returns every verified address we hold for a company at once, and the tech stack tells you which sites are worth pitching.
Your ICP is “Shopify stores running Klaviyo and Gorgias”. Hunter can find emails at those companies once you know which ones they are. AgentData finds the companies and the emails in one query.
Hunter's MCP answers “emails at this domain”. Yours also needs sector, size, stack and whether they just switched tools. One MCP server, seven tools, no credit meter to watch.
Switching from Hunter
- Export your leads. Hunter → Leads → Export CSV. Keep Domain (join key), Email, Confidence, Verification status.
- Re-enrich by domain in AgentData. Loop GET /api/v1/lookup?domain= or upload the domain list; you'll get the company profile and stack plus our verified emails, so you can compare confidence scores side by side.
- Keep Hunter for what it's best at, if you want. Its verifier and Campaigns don't conflict with using AgentData as the data layer. If you cancel, plans are monthly; annual plans run to term.
Field map: Hunter → AgentData
Where Hunter fits better
- Verification as a product. If you need to verify lists from other sources, Hunter's standalone verifier at 0.5 credit is purpose-built; we only verify what we find.
- Outreach in the same tab. Campaigns, sequences and inbox protection mean Hunter can be the whole stack for a small team.
- Source transparency. Hunter shows the URL where it found each address and when; that audit trail matters for compliance-minded teams.
- Manual, browser-first workflows. The Chrome extension and Google Sheets add-on are mature; we're API and web app.
We would rather you pick the right tool than ours for the wrong reasons. Plenty of teams use Hunter to verify and send and AgentData to decide who to contact.
Frequently asked questions
Related reading
Switching from Hunter takes an afternoon.
133M companies. 4,077 technologies. 16M email addresses. Free.